Issue: January 2013
December 21, 2012
1 min read
Save

Epi-LASIK yields less pain than automated brush epithelial removal in PRK

Issue: January 2013
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Flap-off epi-LASIK resulted in slightly less pain than automated brush epithelial removal in PRK, according to a study.

Perspective from Ioannis G. Pallikaris, MD

“Flap-off eyes showed a statistically significant advantage over automated brush PRK in the pain scores. The percentage of epithelial healing time over the first 4 days between groups was not different,” the study authors said.

The prospective study included 120 eyes of 60 active-duty military patients with a mean age of 27.3 years.

All patients underwent surface ablation in both eyes. The automated brush technique was used in one eye and flap-off epi-LASIK was used in the other eye to remove the epithelium prior to PRK.

Investigators measured epithelial defect size daily until re-epithelialization was complete in each eye. Patients completed a pain questionnaire, with a score of 0 denoting no pain and a score of 6 denoting severe pain.

Study results showed that mean logMAR uncorrected distance visual acuity on the day of bandage contact lens removal was 0.29 in the flap-off group and 0.31 in the automated brush group; the between-group difference was insignificant.

The flap-off group had significantly less postoperative pain than the brush group at 1 day (P = .0003), 2 days (P = .0001), 3 days (P < .0001) and 4 days (P < .0001). The average between-group difference in pain scores was 0.33 points.

Bandage contact lenses were removed 3.83 days after surgery in the flap-off group and 4.11 days after surgery in the automated brush group.

Initial epithelial defects were 60.35 mm2 in the flap-off group and 66.34 mm2 in the brush group; the between-group difference was statistically significant (P < .0001).