July 12, 2012
2 min read
Save

Intracorneal ring segment may reduce astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

An intracorneal implant corrected residual astigmatism in eyes that had undergone penetrating keratoplasty, a study found.

Perspective from David R. Hardten, MD

“The postoperative astigmatism associated with penetrating keratoplasty is a common condition in clinical practice,” the study authors said. “The reason for this could be related to factors inherent to the receptor, such as previous corneal trauma or keratoconus. … When optical methods fail to achieve satisfactory visual rehabilitation, surgical treatment may be necessary.”

The retrospective analysis included 59 eyes of 54 patients with a mean age of 36.01 years who underwent PK and subsequent implantation of a Ferrara ring (Ferrara Ophthalmics) to correct residual corneal astigmatism.

LogMAR corrected distance visual acuity, keratometry values, spherical equivalent, spherical refractive error, corneal topographic astigmatism, minimum keratometry and maximum keratometry were evaluated during a mean follow-up period of 14 months.

Study results showed that mean corrected distance visual acuity improved from 0.45 preoperatively to 0.30. No patients lost visual acuity; 28 patients gained at least two lines of corrected distance visual acuity.

Mean spherical equivalent improved from –6.34 D preoperatively to –2.66 D postoperatively. Mean spherical refractive error decreased from –7.10 D to –3.46 D.

Mean corneal topographic astigmatism decreased from 3.37 D to 1.69 D.

The mean maximum keratometry value diminished from 48.90 D to 44.17 D; the mean minimum keratometry value decreased from 44.90 D to 42.46 D.

Improvements in corrected distance visual acuity, spherical equivalent and refractive error were statistically significant (P < .0001), the authors said.