June 19, 2012
2 min read
Save

Statistical model predicts myopic regression risk for LASIK flap creation methods

LASIK flap creation with a femtosecond laser posed a lower risk of myopic regression than flaps created with a mechanical microkeratome, according to a study.

Perspective from Jason P. Brinton, MD

“Information obtained from the predictive model enables clinicians to identify which patient has a higher risk for myopia regression and to more precisely estimate the probability within the follow-up time frame,” the study authors said.

The retrospective, comparative study included 377 patients with a mean age of 29.89 years who underwent bilateral LASIK with a mechanical microkeratome; 409 patients with a mean age of 32.35 years underwent bilateral LASIK with a femtosecond laser.

Flaps were created with a Moria M2 mechanical microkeratome or IntraLase femtosecond (Abbott Medical Optics) laser. Ablation was performed with a Star S4 excimer laser (Visx).

Investigators used a Cox proportional hazards model to evaluate the influence of flap creation methods and other factors on the risk of postoperative myopic regression.

Study results showed insignificant between-group differences in mean spherical equivalent 1 week postoperatively. However, at 12 months, myopic regression was significantly greater in the microkeratome group (P = .0058).

Data adjusted for other contributing factors showed that the cumulative risk for myopic regression was significantly higher with a mechanical microkeratome than with a femtosecond laser (P = .0002).

Based on a definition of myopic regression as a myopic shift of 0.5 D or more and residual myopia of 0.5 D or less, the mechanical microkeratome group had a 66.9% risk of regression and the femtosecond laser group had a 43.6% risk at 12 months, the authors said.