Issue: June 2012
May 03, 2012
1 min read
Save

Transepithelial cross-linking may be a good choice for select patients

Issue: June 2012
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

PARIS — Transepithelial corneal cross-linking has lower efficacy compared with the classic epithelium-off method, but it might be a good option in select cases, such as thin corneas and pediatric patients, according to a study carried out at the University of Bordeaux.

Antoine Robinet-Perrin, MD
Antoine Robinet-Perrin

“We analyzed the outcomes of [transepithelial] CXL in 44 eyes of 37 patients at 6 and 12 months. The mean age of the patients was 23 years, and keratoconus was progressive in all cases. Ricrolin TE (Sooft) was used as a photosensitizing agent,” Antoine Robinet-Perrin, MD, said at the meeting of the French Society of Ophthalmology.

At 1 year, 31.8% of keratoconus cases progressed, 18.2% of cases regressed and 50% of cases remained stable.

“Undoubtedly, the efficacy of the treatment is mitigated by the presence of the epithelium. The disease progresses in a number of patients that is certainly superior to the average we have with epithelium-off CXL, but the treatment is well tolerated, and 70% of the patients still benefit from the procedure,” Dr. Robinet-Perrin said.

“Cases who are not eligible to conventional CXL, such as patients with thin corneas and non-cooperative patients, may be good candidates for this less aggressive form of cross-linking,” he said.

Further studies are necessary to compare the results of transepithelial cross-linking with the epithelium-off procedure.

  • Disclosure: Dr. Robinet-Perrin has no relevant financial disclosures.