February 18, 2011
1 min read
Save

Undercorrection may cause no side effects in refractive accommodative esotropia


Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151(3):535-541.

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Prescribing undercorrected spectacles to patients with refractive accommodative esotropia does not deteriorate vision, a study said.

"Two factors, baseline [spherical equivalent] refractive error and age of onset, had the strongest association with the maximal tolerable amount of under-correction," the study authors said.

The prospective interventional case series included 31 patients with refractive accommodative esotropia who underwent the maximal tolerable amount of undercorrection and seven patients who underwent 1.5 D of undercorrection. Mean patient age was 6.9 years, and mean age of onset noted by parents was 28.8 months.

After a mean 0.89 D of undercorrection, no patient showed deterioration in visual acuity, stereoacuity or fusional ability during the 6-month follow-up period.

"The maximal tolerable amount of under-correction in our patients was much smaller than expected. Only 1 D of under-correction based on cycloplegic refraction increased the angle of deviation in more than half the patients," the authors said.

Two patients experienced a slight increase of 2 ΔD in the angle of deviation, and a small number of patients had mild asthenopia that disappeared within a few days.

Researchers determined that the maximal tolerable amount of undercorrection correlated with mean spherical equivalent refractive error of both eyes (P = .012) and age of onset (P = .006).