April 10, 2009
1 min read
Save

Significant long-term myopic regression observed after LASIK for high myopia

J Refract Surg. 2009;25(2):195-200.

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

LASIK for high myopia was safe and stable over the long term but only moderately predictable.

A retrospective study included 77 eyes of 47 patients with at least 10 D of myopia who underwent LASIK. Mean patient age was 33 years. Mean preoperative spherical refraction was –12.3 D with mean astigmatism of 1.3 D. Intended correction was 10.5 D.

LASIK was performed with the Visx STAR S2 excimer laser (Abbott Medical Optics). Follow-up examinations were performed at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months and between 2 years and 5 years.

At 2 years to 5 years after surgery, 40% of eyes attained spherical equivalent refraction within 1 D of intended refraction, 70% of eyes were within 2 D and 91% were within 3 D. Eyes showed a mild, significant regression toward myopia; mean spherical equivalent refraction was –1.21 D at 1 month, –1.82 at 6 months and –1.95 D at 2 years to 5 years. The differences between the time points were statistically significant (P < .001 and P = .03).

PERSPECTIVE

Right now most people believe, and I believe, that phakic IOLs are a better option than laser in these highly myopic patients. But we always need to consider that lasers may still be an option in individual cases. The take-homes are the fact that this is a very good study because it shows the long-term effects were safe. But it’s not as accurate as phakic IOLs. Several head-to-head studies have shown that phakic IOLs have better quality vision in this above –10 D group. If phakic IOLs are the primary procedure, laser can still be an alternative in select cases.

I’m not doing any patients above –10 D with lasers now because we have three different phakic IOLs available that almost everybody can qualify for. Historically, we don’t have a lot of long-term papers that have been presented on high myopia LASIK. I don’t think anybody is suggesting as a primary procedure to do LASIK in people above –10 D. This is a great work and provides historical basis that LASIK can be done above –10 D. But put in modern perspective, it’s not as accurate and doesn’t have the high-quality vision of phakic IOLs, so it should only be used as a backup if somebody is not a candidate for a phakic IOL.

– Daniel S. Durrie, MD
OSN Refractive Surgery Section Editor