October 19, 2009
1 min read
Save

Intracorneal ring segment implantation has good results with mechanical or laser tunnelization

Ophthalmology. 2009;116(9):1675-1687.

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Intracorneal ring segment implantation with either femtosecond laser tunnelization or mechanical tunnelization yielded positive visual and refractive outcomes in eyes with keratoconus, a study showed.

"Intracorneal ring segment implantation using both mechanical and femtosecond laser-assisted procedures provide similar visual and refractive outcomes," the study authors said. "A more limited aberrometric correction is observed for eyes with mechanical implantation."

The retrospective study included 146 eyes; 68 patients had unilateral keratoconus and 39 patients had bilateral keratoconus. Sixty-three eyes underwent mechanical tunnelization, and 83 eyes underwent femtosecond laser-assisted tunnelization.

In the mechanical group, 55 eyes received an Intacs implant (Addition Technology) and eight eyes received a Keraring implant (Mediphacos). In the femtosecond laser group, 25 eyes received the Intacs implant and 58 eyes received the Keraring implant.

At 6 months, uncorrected visual acuity and refraction improved in both groups (both P ≤ .02). Best corrected visual acuity improved in the femtosecond laser group (P < .01). The femtosecond laser group had reduced root mean square astigmatism (P = .03) but increases in some higher-order aberrations (P = .03).

Eyes in the femtosecond laser group implanted with Intacs had lower primary spherical aberrations, coma and other higher-order aberrations (P ≤ .01).

The mechanical group showed a significant negative correlation between preoperative corneal aberrations and postoperative BCVA (P ≤ .04), the authors said.