Extracting Wavefront Error From Shack-Hartmann Images Using Spatial Demodulation
PURPOSE
To determine whether the spatial demodulation processing of Shack-Hartmann images is suitable for extracting wavefront gradients for ocular wavefront sensors.
METHODS
We developed a custom software program to implement the spatial demodulation technique. To test the algorithm’s performance, we generated simulated spot images and obtained an eye examination image. We generated a collection of simulated aberrated spot images corresponding to: astigmatic wavefront (–5.00 –2.00 X 17), highly aberrated defocus (±20.00 diopters [D]), high-resolution defocus (–0.01 D), and third-order aberrations (trefoil and coma). The eye examination image and its measured Zernike coefficients were obtained from a Shack-Hartmann ocular aberrations system. We evaluated the output from the algorithm in terms of comparing the results to the known Zernike coefficients (for the simulated images) or the previously measured Zernike coefficients (for the eye examination image).
RESULTS
The spatial demodulation algorithm was able to correctly recover the aberrations to better than 1/100 (0.01) D for the simulated spot images. The processing of the eye examination image yielded results within approximately 1/4 (0.25) D to the values provided by the Shack-Hartmann system.
CONCLUSIONS
From the set of simulated images and the eye examination image used to test the spatial demodulation technique, it appears that the method is suitable for application in ocular wavefront aberrations Shack-Hartmann systems. The method appears capable of accurately processing high levels of aberrations (±20.00 D) as well as providing high resolution as evidenced by finding the –0.01 D defocus. The method may be especially well suited for processing highly aberrated wavefronts. [J Refract Surg. 2006;22:949-953.]
AUTHORS
From Sarver and Associates Inc, Carbondale, Ill (Sarver); Ophthalmology & Vision Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Ariz (Schwiegerling); and Visual Optics Institute, College of Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, Tex (Applegate).
The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in the materials presented herein.
Correspondence: Edwin J. Sarver, PhD, Sarver and Associates Inc, 131 Phillips Rd, Carbondale, IL 62902. Tel: 618.529.4225; Fax: 618.457.5600; E-mail: ejsarver@aol.com