Read more

August 27, 2021
3 min read
Save

COVID-19 impacted dietary care for patients on dialysis, raising malnutrition concerns

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

The COVID-19 pandemic led to a variety of changes in the nutritional care provided to patients receiving hemodialysis across the United States, according to results of a survey administered to 191 dialysis dieticians.

Perspective from Becky Brosch, RD, CSR, LD

These changes included bans on eating or drinking during dialysis treatments throughout the pandemic and less time dedicated to nutritional care for patients who tested positive for COVID-19, both of which researchers cited as concerning given the high risk for malnutrition in this patient population.

Survey of dialysis dieticians
Infographic content was derived from May R, et al. J Ren Nutrit. 2021;doi:10.1053/j.jrn.2021.07.006.

“Despite the intensive nutrition needs of the dialysis population (with or without COVID-19 infection) and the fact that [CMS] requires a dietitian in every dialysis unit, previous research demonstrates that a significant portion of the dialysis dietitian’s time is spent in indirect care and that many patient encounters are short,” Rachael May, MS, RDN, LD, clinical dietitian at Banner Health, and colleagues, wrote. “As much of health care has shifted to telehealth in response to the pandemic, and regulations have eased to allow telehealth under more circumstances during the pandemic, it is unclear whether dialysis dietitians are also providing virtual care to in-center patients, or whether they are still seeing patients in person, given that patients still must attend dialysis. Whatever the modality of the encounter, it is important to investigate whether dietitians are able to spend additional time with their patients given the increased nutrition burden they may be facing during the pandemic.”

Contending that potential burnout experienced by dialysis dietitians is also an important consideration, researchers from Case Western Reserve University developed a survey to assess how job responsibilities may have shifted and to capture observations regarding patient nutritional behaviors approximately 10 months into the pandemic (the survey was open for 2 weeks in December 2020).

“The survey asked individuals to think about what was happening currently compared to a pre-pandemic period, rather than trying to differentiate between how the pandemic had waxed and waned in different states at different times,” the researchers wrote.

Less time spent with patients, behavior shifts

While most respondents indicated no change in the amount of time they were spending with patients, 52% reported that patients who tested positive for COVID-19 were transferred to another designated facility and 36% reported spending less time with these patients. In addition, 39% reported spending less time with all patients (positive or negative for COVID-19), with stated reasons including wanting to limit exposure, extra time taken to put on personal protective equipment and being asked to take on responsibilities, such as screening patients and employees for COVID-19.

Although respondents reported “relatively few changes in patient health behaviors and nutrition-related biomarkers,” results showed the most common changes were cooking at home more often, engaging in physical activity less often, increases in serum phosphorous and increases in interdialytic weight gain. No significant changes in medication compliance were observed by dietitians, though 88% of respondents did report noticing an increase in patient stress levels.

Regarding food access, 69% of respondents reported that patients had a family or friend shop for them while 60% reported patients were going to the store less often. Further, 31% of respondents noted that patients were using foodbanks/pantries and/or SNAP more frequently and 28% reported that patients shared having less money for food.

Eating, drinking bans

Eating/drinking bans were common, with more than 60% of respondents noting such bans (Fresenius facilities were more likely to institute eating/drinking bans than DaVita and nonprofit facilities).

“Prior to the pandemic, eating during dialysis was becoming a more accepted practice in the U.S., supported by the publication of the 2018 International Society of Renal Nutrition and Metabolism (ISRNM) consensus statement supporting intradialytic meals and/or [oral nutrition supplements] ONS to improve nutritional status and data demonstrating reductions in mortality and hospitalizations with an intradialytic ONS protocol,” the researchers wrote. “However, our data suggest that the pandemic may be causing a reversal in the progress made toward intradialytic nutrition: 62% of respondents stated that their center adopted a no eating/drinking policy during dialysis due to COVID-19 and masking policies, with wide variation in how ONS protocols were handled.

Clinicians must be vigilant in not allowing an eating/drinking prohibition during treatment to become permanent, especially as respondents cited concerns for the impact of this ban on patients who have diabetes and/or dementia. The benefits of providing meals and/or ONS during treatment may outweigh the risk of COVID-19 transmission when precautions are taken.”

Mental health impact, future research

The survey also revealed additional stressors placed upon dialysis dietitians, with 20% stating they considered leaving their position or employer during the pandemic.

“Dialysis dietitians are not immune from the mental health effects of working as a health care professional during the COVID-19 pandemic. Workplace solutions for stress management in health providers may include providing opportunities to speak with team members about how stress during the pandemic is affecting work, setting clear expectations, and making mental health resources more accessible,” May and colleagues concluded.

“Future research should monitor whether trends observed in this survey become permanent. Beyond the concerns about permanent eating/drinking prohibitions discussed above, other trends to monitor include increased patient loads for dietitians, increased responsibilities such as screening, and other external factors (PPE, fear of infection) influencing the already limited time for direct patient care.”