Read more

February 15, 2020
1 min read
Save

Trivalent and quadrivalent vaccines offer similar protection against flu B illness

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Trivalent and quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccines offered similar protection against influenza B illness during four recent influenza seasons, study findings showed.

“We wanted to study whether adding another B lineage virus in the inactivated influenza vaccine to make it a quadrivalent formulation from a trivalent one improved vaccine effectiveness against outpatient medical visits for any influenza B illnesses,” Manjusha Gaglani, MBBS, director and founder of the Center for Research in Vaccines and Infections at the Baylor Scott & White Medical Center, Texas A&M College of Medicine, told Healio.

Gaglani and colleagues used the U.S. Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network to analyze data on 25,019 outpatients aged 6 months or older, enrolled within 7 days of illness onset during six influenza seasons starting with 2011-2012. According to the study, upper respiratory specimens were tested for influenza virus type and B lineage. Then, using logistic regression, the researchers estimated the effectiveness of the trivalent and quadrivalent vaccines by comparing the odds of influenza B infection overall and by B lineage among vaccinated vs. unvaccinated participants.

Overall, they found that even though the quadrivalent vaccine provided better protection against the B lineage during four influenza seasons from 2013-2014 to 2016-2017, it did not protect better than the trivalent vaccine against outpatient medical visits for any influenza B illness. According to the study, during those four influenza seasons when both vaccines were widely used, overall effectiveness against any influenza B was 53% (95% CI, 45-59) for the quadrivalent vaccine vs. 45% (95% CI, 34-54) for the trivalent vaccine.

“Despite providing better protection against the influenza B lineage not included in trivalent vaccine, quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine may not afford better protection against any influenza B illness in the outpatient setting,” Gaglani said. “There is some cross-protection afforded with trivalent vaccine containing either of the two influenza B lineage viruses, B/Yamagata and B/Victoria. The potential for cross-protection against the B lineage not included in trivalent vaccine is important to consider during vaccine strain selection of the B lineage virus to be included in the trivalent vaccine.” – by Caitlyn Stulpin

Disclosures: Gaglani reports receiving grants from the CDC. Please see the study for all other authors’ relevant financial disclosures.