June 24, 2019
2 min read
Save

Researchers investigate nonbite transmission of P. multocida

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Don W. Kannangara, MD, MSc, Phd, DTMRH, MRCP
Don Walter Kannangara

SAN FRANCISCO — Researchers investigated 79 cases of pet-associated Pasteurella multocida infection that occurred over a 30-month period and found that 34 were not associated with a bite from a dog or cat, the usual mode of transmission, according to findings presented at ASM Microbe.

Novel modes of transmission identified by the researchers included wound infection by pet saliva and sharing food with a dog.

“What prompted this was that [within the last year and a half] a man with diabetes was admitted with chills and shaking and high fever,” Don Walter Kannangara, MD, PhD, DTM&H, MRCP, an infectious disease specialist at St. Luke’s University Health Network in Pennsylvania, told Infectious Disease News. “He had previous wound cultures with Acinetobacter baumannii and various other organisms. He had been treated for that and that’s what we thought was causing the infection, but the blood cultures grew Pasteurella multocida. Then he remembered that there was a tiny wound on his big toe that was licked by a dog.”

In the following months, Kannangara saw two more cases of P. multocida caused by nonbite transmission (NBT).

Photo of a mean cat 
Pet associated P. multocida infections not transmitted through bites have resulted in life-threatening infections.
Source: Adobe Stock

“I got permission from the institutional review board to look for more. Our network has 10 hospitals and when we checked the electronic health care records for the previous 30 months, there were 79 cases,” he said.

Kannangara and colleagues reviewed the charts of the 79 patients with culture-positive P. multocida, as well as previous P. multocida studies.

According to the findings, 63.1% of patients were aged 50 to 80 years. There were 45 infections associated with a bite — 29 from cats and 16 from dogs — and 34 cases that were not associated with a bite.

Among the NBT group, novel modes of transmission included:

  • stepping on dog drool and contaminating a foot ulcer;
  • contamination of a wound by socks covered with cat hairs and dander;
  • falling down when drunk and contaminating abrasions with dog saliva; and
  • epiglottitis after eating peanut butter and crackers that had been half-eaten by a dog.

The researchers reported that non-bite infections cause by P. multocida were associated with more life-threatening infections. They said pet owners should protect open wounds, and individuals with certain underlying diseases should avoid pet exposure completely.

“When you get bitten, you know you were bitten. You can see the bite and usually they see a doctor, or clean the wound, or do something about it,” Kannangara said. “But when the dog comes and licks your toe, they don’t do anything about it so the infection can easily spread.” – by Marley Ghizzone

Reference:

Kannangara DW, et al. 79 cases of pet associated Pasteurella multocida infections in a 30-month period with reports of novel modes of non-bite transmission and their significance; Presented at: ASM Microbe; June 20-24, 2019; San Francisco.

Disclosures: The authors report no relevant financial disclosures.