Issue: August 2018
July 09, 2018
2 min read
Save

Current Shingrix vaccination schedule unlikely cost-effective

Issue: August 2018
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Last year, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices made a recommendation to vaccinate adults aged 50 years and older with the new recombinant adjuvanted zoster subunit vaccine, Shingrix, over the only other FDA-approved vaccine, Zostavax. The committee also recommended that adults previously vaccinated with Zostavax receive an immediate booster with Shingrix. New data, however, show it would be more cost-effective to begin vaccinating adults at 55 years of age and offer the booster after 5 years of Zostavax vaccination.

“The recommendations by the ACIP was informed by the CDC model, which assumed a high probability of postherpetic neuralgia and 100% adherence,” Phuc Le, PhD, MPH, and Michael B. Rothberg, MD, MPH, both from the Center for Value-Based Care Research at Cleveland Clinic, wrote in JAMA Internal Medicine. “In this modeling study, we found that neither ACIP recommendation would be cost-effective, unless adherence to the two-dose regimen approached 100%.”

According to the researchers, it is unlikely that all patients will be 100% adherent to the two-dose Shingrix (GlaxoSmithKline) schedule because of the high costs of the full series, which is approximately $280. Additional barriers to compliance include the need for a second office visit, potential reimbursement issues and concerns with severe local reaction after the first dose, which occurs in an estimated 6% of patients.

For their study, Le and Rothberg calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of Shingrix based on willingness-to-pay thresholds of $50,000 per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and $100,000 per QALYs. They compared ICERs when adherence rates to the two-dose vaccine schedule were assumed to 100% and “a more realistic estimate” of 56%.

In a probabilistic sensitivity analysis, vaccination at 50 years of age had a 23% chance of being cost-effective. The model showed that higher adherence to the full schedule increased cost-effectiveness at younger ages. The ICER was estimated to be $151,430 per QUALY at 50 years of age, declining to less than $100,000 per QALY at 53.2 years of age and less than $50,000 per QALY at 57.1 years of age.

When assessing the cost-effectiveness of the booster dose, the researchers reported that immediate revaccination was only reasonably cost-effective when adherence was 100%. When adherence was assumed to be 56%, the booster had a 9% chance of being cost-effective when given immediately and a 75% chance when given after 5 years of initial vaccination.

PAGE BREAK

“Given our best estimates, vaccination with [Shingrix] at 55 years of age and a booster at least 5 years after [Zostavax (Merck) vaccination] would offer better value,” the researchers concluded. “Clinicians may consider vaccination earlier for patients who are very likely to comply with a second dose,” they wrote. “In all cases, efforts should be made to enhance compliance with the full series,” they wrote. – by Stephanie Viguers

Disclosures: The researchers report no relevant financial disclosures.