This article is more than 5 years old. Information may no longer be current.
Electronic surveillance identifies vaccine-related health events during MenB outbreak
Click Here to Manage Email Alerts
An online surveillance program to detect health events following immunization was successfully implemented during an outbreak of serogroup B meningococcal disease at a university campus, researchers reported.
“This surveillance method can assist public health to monitor unexpected health events or emerging vaccine concerns during the implementation of emergency vaccine programs, and allow quick response should any events be noted,” Joanne Langley, MD, MSc, from Dalhousie University in Nova Scotia, Canada, and colleagues wrote.
The researchers conducted their study alongside an emergency vaccination campaign at a university in Canada during an outbreak of serogroup B meningococcal disease. Study participants included 2,967 students who received at least one dose of Bexsero (4CMenB, Novartis/GlaxoSmithKline). The researchers administered an online survey to study participants that gathered information related to the number of doses received, demographics, and any new or worsening health problems reported.
Study results showed that 84.7% of students received at least one dose of 4CMenB, and 70% received the second dose. The researchers found that health events were reported by 30% of recipients after the first dose and 30.3% after the second dose, compared with 15.9% among unvaccinated controls. Health events inhibited normal activities in 74.7% of those reporting events after the first dose and 62.6% of those reporting events after the second dose. Furthermore, health events resulted in visits to health care professionals in 12.8% after dose one and 14.4% after dose two.
The most commonly reported health events were injection site reactions and nonspecific systemic complaints. The researchers noted that there were no hospitalizations and all health events reported during surveillance were consistent with previously reported adverse events.
“Our research network was able to rapidly implement a survey because the preparatory work to run it had already been done, and the [Canadian Immunization Research Network] facilitated rapid collaboration of persons with the necessary expertise,” Langley and colleagues wrote. “Preparatory work for research studies must be done ahead of emergent infectious disease issues in order for them to be feasibly conducted at the time of a public health crisis.” – by David Costill
- Reference:
- Langley JM, et al. Vaccine. 2016;doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.06.025.
Disclosure: The researchers report no relevant financial disclosures.
Perspective
Back to Top
Rodrigo Hasbun, MD
This is a good study in the sense that, in an outbreak setting, it shows that we were able to have emergency vaccination implemented quickly, and able to track side effects, as least as much as was possible with an online survey. While the survey gives an idea of the side effects in an outbreak setting, there are still limitations to the study: Obviously, not everyone responded to the survey, the survey was anonymous, and the survey was conducted after the vaccine was already given. Additionally, the survey invitation was sent a week after the vaccines were already administered, so there could be some recall bias.
The most important aspect of this study is the speed at which we were able to implement vaccination during an outbreak setting. The two cases of invasive meningococcal disease occurred on Feb. 1 and Feb. 11; within 2 days the meningococcal B vaccine program was announced, and less than a week later, on Feb. 18, vaccinations were initiated.
This is worthwhile information for providers to have in order to spread awareness to their patients that while there are outbreaks of meningococcal disease, we now have vaccines to try to arrest those outbreaks.
Click Here to Manage Email Alerts