Issue: July 2016
June 24, 2016
1 min read
Save

Multiplex testing does not reduce antibiotic use among non-flu respiratory outpatients

Issue: July 2016
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

BOSTON — Although adoption of a multiplex respiratory virus testing platform reduced antibiotic prescriptions given to outpatients diagnosed with influenza, it had no significant impact among those with other noninfluenza respiratory pathogens, according to new data presented at ASM Microbe 2016.

“Detection of known respiratory viral pathogens [was] predicted to reduce antibiotic prescription rates among adult outpatients, but our study really failed to find such an effect, unless the patient tested positive for influenza,” Daniel A. Green, MD, clinical fellow in laboratory medicine at Yale School of Medicine, said during a presentation. “Therefore, the additional benefit of performing multiplex viral testing over targeted influenza testing among outpatients is questionable, especially considering the additional cost of these tests.”

Green and colleagues examined diagnoses made using the FilmArray Respiratory Panel (Biofire Diagnostics) at the West Haven VA Hospital between Dec. 15, 2014 to April 15, 2015. They divided patients into study groups based on their diagnosis (influenza, noninfluenza pathogen, negative), and examined medical records to identify trends in antibiotic or Tamiflu (oseltamivir, Roche) prescriptions.

Of the 295 outpatients included in the study cohort — which was made up of primarily older men — 105 were diagnosed with influenza, 109 were diagnosed with a noninfluenza upper respiratory infection (URI), and 81 received negative results. Those diagnosed with influenza more often received oseltamivir and less frequently were prescribed antibiotics. There were no significant differences in treatments between the noninfluenza and negative result groups, Green said, suggesting no clinical benefit in implementing the multiplex assay.

“Our data argue that either targeted influenza testing alone may be a more cost effective approach for adult outpatients with URIs,” Green said. “Or, if multiplex testing is to be implemented, it must be paired with provider education and antimicrobial stewardship to discourage the overuse of antibiotics for uncomplicated viral URIs.” – by Dave Muoio

Reference:

Green DA, et al. Clinical utility of on-demand multiplex respiratory virus testing among outpatients. Presented at: ASM Microbe; June 16-20, 2016; Boston.

Disclosures: Green reports no relevant financial disclosures. Please see the full study for a list of all other authors’ relevant financial disclosures.