August 25, 2015
2 min read
Save

Researchers identify significant SSI risk in patients with diabetes

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

A recent meta-analysis published in the American Journal of Infection Control confirmed that patients with diabetes are at significant risk for surgical site infection.

Perspective from

“Considering the consistent findings of increased SSI risk associated with diabetes across a number of prospective cohort studies and the reliability and robustness of our meta-analysis, we strongly recommend that future studies focus on the plausible causal mechanisms,” Yu Zhang, MPH, from the Guangdong Academy of Medicine Science and Guangdong General Hospital in Guangzhou, China, and colleagues wrote in their study. “Intervention studies concerning perioperative blood glucose control are also warranted to confirm this observed association to elucidate whether the association is causal.”

Zhang and colleagues performed a literature search in the PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases of studies with a prospective cohort design with a calculated OR, RR, or HR of patients with diabetes developing surgical site infections (SSI). They identified 14 prospective cohort studies with 91,094 participants, with the incidence of SSI ranging from 0.72% to 17%.

The researchers found that the crude RR of developing SSI was 2.02 (95% CI, 1.68–2.43); however, they noted significant study heterogeneity in their meta-analysis, at 56.5%. While seven of the 14 included studies did not have adjusted RR, the studies had a pooled adjusted RR of 1.69 (95% CI, 1.3–2.13), showing a consistent increased risk for patients with diabetes to develop SSIs.

A subgroup analysis of heterogeneity showed that each study had consistent and statistically significant results, and stratified analyses identified sample size, diabetes case ascertainment method and the number of adjusted confounders as potential sources of heterogeneity, according to the researchers. Sensitivity analysis also demonstrated the “robustness of the result,” they said. – by Jeff Craven

Disclosure: The researchers report no relevant financial disclosures.