August 31, 2015
2 min read
Save

Responses similar to double- vs. single-dose HBV revaccination in HIV patients

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Researchers found no difference in seroprotection rates between a double-dose hepatitis B virus vaccine regimen and a standard single-dose regimen in adults with HIV who did not respond to previous hepatitis B vaccination.

The safety profiles between the two regimens were similar, and the mean titer of protective hepatitis B surface antibodies (anti-HBs) was higher and had longer sustainability in those who received the double-dose regimen.

In a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial conducted at 53 centers in France, researchers assigned 178 adults with HIV who did not respond to previous HBV vaccination or a 20-μg booster dose to receive either standard (20 μg; n = 90) or double-dose (40 μg; n = 88) recombinant HBV vaccine at 0, 4 and 24 weeks.

The study’s primary endpoint was the proportion of responders — defined as patients with anti-HB titers of 10 mIU/mL or more. At 28 weeks, 67% (95% CI, 57-77) of patients in the standard-dose group and 74% (95% CI, 63-82) in the double-dose group responded to the vaccine. Despite this similarity, the researchers found that more patients in the double-dose group (51%) had a high-level response (titer of protective anti-HBs of 100 mIU/mL or more) compared with the standard-dose group (26%). In addition, at 72 weeks, 54% of patients in the double-dose group vs. 31% in the standard-dose group had a sustained response.

There was no difference in safety between the groups besides more frequent local reactions in the double-dose group (15%) vs. the standard-dose group (4%). Vaccinations were discontinued in 7% of patients in the standard-dose group and 5% of patients in the double-dose group. Seven percent of patients in the standard-dose group and 4% in the double-dose group experienced serious adverse events, but none was considered vaccine-related.

Although the double-dose regimen did not yield a higher response rate, it “resulted in a more robust and durable immunological response, with a safety profile similar to that of the standard-dose regimen,” the researchers wrote. “Our results should be confirmed by future studies before double-dose vaccine can be considered for standard-of-care use in vaccine nonresponders.” – by Tina DiMarcantonio

Disclosure: Rey reports receiving honoraria from Gilead Sciences and travel support from Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Janssen and Merck. Please see the full study for a list of all other authors’ relevant financial disclosures.