August 14, 2012
2 min read
Save

Shorter course of doxycycline effective treatment for erythema migrans

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Compared with a 15-day course of oral doxycycline, a 10-day course was noninferior in European patients with erythema migrans.

Perspective from Eugene Shapiro, MD

“The efficacy of shorter, 10-day treatment with doxycycline has been estimated in the United States, but not Europe,” researchers from Ljubljana, Slovenia, wrote. “The clinical course of erythema migrans in Europe differs somewhat from that in the United States, and there has been no direct comparison between the two continents on the efficacy of individual antibiotics for this condition.”

The researchers conducted a noninferiority trial to evaluate the efficacies of a 10-day doxycycline regimen and a 15-day doxycycline regimen. They compared nonspecific symptoms between patients with erythema migrans and control participants without Lyme borreliosis. They assessed the efficacy of treatment at 14 days, 2, 6 and 12 months.

The study included 117 patients who received a 15-day course of doxycycline treatment and 108 patients who received a 10-day course of doxycycline treatment. After 12 months, a complete response was seen in 93.4% of the patients in the 15-day group and 91.9% of patients in the 10-day group.

Most patients in both groups had a complete response from 2 months onward. Nonspecific symptoms were similar among patients in the control group and in the treatment groups at 6 months.

“In comparison with lengthy treatment, short courses of antibiotics are safer, cheaper and more convenient and have fewer detrimental ecologic effects,” the researchers wrote. “The challenge is to achieve a favorable treatment result with the shortest possible course of antibiotics.”

References:

Stupica D. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55:343-350.

Disclosures:

The researchers report no relevant financial disclosures.