Issue: June 2012
May 03, 2012
1 min read
Save

CMS policy led to increased attention to HAI prevention

Issue: June 2012
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Results of a national survey that assessed the effect of the 2008 CMS policy to adjust payment for health care-associated infections indicated that 81% of infection preventionists reported increased attention to health care-associated infections targeted by the policy.

In December 2010, researchers sent a survey to a random sample of US acute care hospitals affected by the CMS inpatient prospective payment system (n=317). The duration of experience among survey participants varied: 45% reported working in the infection control field for more than 10 years, whereas 31% reported working in the field for 5 years or less.

Although 19% reported that they participated in pay-for-performance programs aimed at reducing health care-associated infections (HAIs) via private insurers, 85% stated that their institution supported local, regional and national efforts to decrease HAIs.

Seventy-seven percent reported stable funding for infection control associated with the CMS policy vs. 15% of those who reported increased funding. As a result of the policy, faster removal of central venous (50%) and urinary catheters (71%) were reported. Conversely, routine urine (27%) and blood testing (13%) upon hospital admission occurred less frequently.

Larger hospitals appeared to spend less time on nontargeted HAIs (OR=2.3; 95% CI, 1-5.1) when compared with hospitals with front-line staff who were receptive to change (OR=0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.8).

“Infection preventionists reported greater hospital attention to preventing targeted HAIs as a result of the CMS nonpayment policy,” the researchers wrote. “Whether the increased focus and greater engagement in HAI prevention practices has led to better patient outcomes is unclear.”

References:

  • Lee GM. Am J Infect Control. 2012;40:314-319.

Disclosures:

  • The researchers report no relevant financial disclosures.