March 31, 2011
2 min read
Save

Electronic faucets more likely to be contaminated with high levels of bacteria

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Electronic faucets are meant to reduce water consumption and recontamination of hands in the hospital setting, but they are more likely to become contaminated with high levels of bacteria compared with traditional manually operated faucets, according to researchers.

“Differences in bacterial contamination that we found persisted despite sterilization of the hospital water supply,” Emily Sydnor, MD, infectious disease fellow at The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, said during a telebriefing in advance of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2011 Annual Scientific Meeting. “We also found concentrated growth of bacteria on the valves and internal components of the electronic-eye faucets, suggesting that these areas provided surface area for increased bacterial growth and biocell formation that likely led to contamination of the water.”

The researchers collected water samples from 20 manual faucets and 20 newly installed electronic faucets at The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine between Dec. 15, 2008, and Jan. 29, 2009. Researchers then assessed Legionella spp. and heterotrophic plate count cultures and the efficacy of chlorine dioxide remediation in the water from the contaminated faucets. All faucets received water from the same source.

Compared with 50% of cultures from electronic faucets, only 15% of cultures from manual faucets tested positive for Legionella spp. (P<.001). Further, significant growth on heterotrophic plate count cultures were found in 26% of electronic faucets with more than 500 colony-forming units/mL vs. only 13% of manual faucets (P=.10).

After chlorine dioxide remediation, 14% of electronic faucet cultures and only 3% of manual faucet cultures remained contaminated with Legionella spp. (P=.14); 29% of electronic faucet cultures and 7% of manual faucet cultures had heterotrophic plate count growth (P=.03).

According to the researchers, significant bacteria growth occurred on the hot water check valves before and after chlorine remediation.

“We did not directly correlate risk for infection with contamination of electronic-eye faucets; however, they may pose a risk for health care-associated infection,” Sydnor told Infectious Disease News. “In order to minimize the risk for health care-associated infections, infection control teams should evaluate existing electronic-eye faucets for bacterial contamination and consider removal and/or not installing them in clinical areas where at-risk patients may be exposed.” – by Ashley DeNyse

For more information:

  • Sydnor E. #65. Presented ahead of: the SHEA 2011 Annual Scientific Meeting; April 1-4, 2011; Dallas.

Disclosure: Dr. Sydnor reports no relevant financial disclosures.

PERSPECTIVE

As infectious disease experts, our job is to remain vigilant about protecting patients from potential exposure to infection-causing agents. This means that no matter how innovative the technology, the benefits must always be weighed against patient protection.

Steven Gordon, MD

President, SHEA

Twitter Follow InfectiousDiseaseNews.com on Twitter.