September 01, 2011
1 min read
Save

HIV-2 cases concentrated in northeastern US

Torian LV. MMWR. 2011;60(29):985-988.

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

CDC surveillance indicate that HIV-2 infections are concentrated in the northeastern United States — primarily in New York City, and among those born in West Africa, according to recent findings published in a Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.

Officials recommend for suspected HIV-2 cases to be reported to state or local health departments for additional testing to avoid misclassification as HIV-1.

According to background information in the study, there is a need for surveillance case definition of HIV-infection to differentiate between HIV-1 and HIV-2. For this reason, Richard M. Selik, MD, of the CDC’s division of HIV/AIDS Prevention-Surveillance and Epidemiology, and colleagues set out to classify HIV-2 cases in the United States between 1987 and 2009. A working case definition required one or more of three criteria:

  • HIV-1/HIV-2 type-differentiating antibody immunoassay.
  • Positive HIV-2 nucleic acid test (DNA or RNA).
  • Positive HIV-2 immunoblot and negative or indeterminate HIV-1 immunoblot.

Overall, 166 cases met the case definition criteria, of which 66% were reported from the Northeast. Specifically, 46% were from New York City and 81% of all cases were born in West Africa.

Although HIV-2 cases were rare, some HIV-2 cases may not have been recognized, as 60% of all HIV-2 cases also had positive HIV-1 immunoblot antibody test results, according to the researchers.

“Correct identification of HIV-2 is important because many drugs used to treat HIV-1 are not effective against HIV-2,” Selik told Infectious Disease News. “Health care providers and laboratories should consider specific testing for HIV-2 if tests for HIV-1 are inconsistent with one another, inconclusive or imply the absence of HIV infection despite clinical evidence suggesting its presence — particularly if the patient is from West Africa.”

In an accompanying editorial, CDC officials wrote: “Regional differences in the percentage of reported HIV cases caused by HIV-2 may be in part a result of the nonuniform geographic distribution of US residents born in West Africa. New York is a major gateway for African immigrants to the United States. However, regional differences in the percentage of HIV cases caused by HIV-2 also could be the result of variations in completeness of diagnosis and reporting of HIV-2 by laboratories and state HIV surveillance programs.”

Disclosure: Dr. Selik reports no relevant financial disclosures.

Twitter Follow InfectiousDiseaseNews.com on Twitter.