Read more

January 25, 2024
2 min read
Save

Circulating tumor DNA detection may predict treatment outcomes in colorectal cancer

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Key takeaways:

  • Patients who are ctDNA positive during the MRD window have significantly inferior DFS.
  • Both ctDNA-based detection of MRD and ctDNA dynamics in response to adjuvant therapy are prognostic of patient outcomes.
Perspective from Brett L. Ecker, MD

Circulating tumor DNA-based detection of molecular residual disease appeared to be highly prognostic of patient outcomes, according to data presented at ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium.

Researchers also found circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) dynamics in response to adjuvant chemotherapy to also be a key predictor of patient outcomes.

Among patients who tested MRD-positive after surgery infographic
Data derived from Yukami H, et al. Abstract 6. Presented at: ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium; Jan. 18-20, 2024; San Francisco.

“Our data demonstrate the prognostic value and predictive capabilities of circulating tumor DNA detection analyzed in (approximately) 3,000 patients at 24 months,” Hiroki Yukami, MD, PhD, member of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University in Japan, said during a presentation. “The importance of circulating tumor DNA quantification by [mean tumor molecules/mL] is also shown.”

Background and methodology

Prior data analysis from the observational GALAXY study showed postsurgical detection of molecular residual disease (MRD) to be a prognostic indicator of patient outcomes, as well as a significant risk factor for recurrence, regardless of BRAF V600E mutation status.

Researchers conducted an updated analysis and correlation of ctDNA dynamics with outcomes among patients with radically resected stage II to stage IV colorectal cancer from the same study.

They used a personalized, tumor-informed assay for detection and quantification of ctDNA in serial plasma samples collected at 1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, 12-, 18- and 24-month time periods after surgery until disease recurrence. Study investigators also conducted CT scans of the chest, abdomen, and pelvic regions every 6 months.

Study participants underwent either treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy or observation following curative-intent surgery.

DFS served as the study’s primary endpoint, defined as the time between the date of surgery and date of detection of relapse/death due to any cause.

Of the 5,781 patients with colorectal cancer enrolled in the GALAXY study, 2,998 met the inclusion criteria for data analysis.

Researchers noted a median follow-up of 16.14 months (range, 0.23-42.14).

Results

Of the 2,860 patients for which researchers had ctDNA analysis during the postoperative MRD window, 275 (14.8%) showed ctDNA-positive results and 1,783 (85.2%) tested as ctDNA-negative.

Researchers observed that patients with stage II to stage II colorectal cancer who tested ctDNA-positive during the MRD window had significantly inferior DFS compared with ctDNA-negative patients (33.5% vs. 89.3%; HR = 12.05; 95% CI, 9.46-15.34)

Within the MRD-positive subgroup, landmark analysis of ctDNA dynamics from first MRD detection to the 3-month time point showed that patients who remained ctDNA-positive had more than 5-times the likelihood to experience disease recurrence compared with those who had ctDNA clearance (HR = 5.4; 95% CI, 3.58-7.67).

Of the 309 MRD-positive patients, 181 received adjuvant therapy, 132 (72.9%) of which had subsequent ctDNA clearance.

Researchers noted that patients with sustained clearance had better outcomes compared with those with transient ctDNA clearance (HR = 32.57; 95% CI, 9.94-106.76).

They also reported significantly longer DFS among patients who were MRD-positive, received adjuvant therapy, and experienced a 50% or greater decrease in ctDNA levels at 6 months compared with those who had less than a 50% decrease (HR = 2.41; 95% CI, 1.42-4.09).

Next steps

The results provide several markers for oncologists to look for in treating this patient population, according to study investigators.

“Stage I to IV patients with ctDNA detected post surgery have significantly lower DFS at 24 months than ctDNA negative patients,” Yukami said, adding that “ctDNA status during surveillance is significantly associated with DFS.

The results also suggest that a reduction in ctDNA concentration at 6 months is a useful predictor of treatment outcomes, according to Yukami.

“ctDNA-guided adjuvant strategies will further be established by ongoing randomized interventional VEGA and ALTAIR clinical trials that are part of CIRCULATE-Japan,” Yukami said.