Read more

February 23, 2023
2 min read
Save

Nivolumab plus cabozantinib improves outcomes in advanced renal cell carcinoma

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

SAN FRANCISCO — Nivolumab plus cabozantinib extended OS and PFS compared with sunitinib as first-line treatment for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma, according to updated results of the randomized phase 3 CheckMate 9ER trial.

An analysis performed after a median 44 months of follow-up showed the benefit persisted regardless of PD-L1 status, findings presented at ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium showed.

Nivolumab-cabozantinib improves outcomes vs. sunitinib infographic
Data derived from Burotto M, et al. Abstract 603. Presented at: ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium; Feb. 16-18, 2023: San Francisco.

“This is the first time we have this long of maturity in a [trial of an] immunotherapy/[tyrosine kinase inhibitor] combination [in this setting],” Mauricio Burotto, MD, medical oncologist at Bradford Hill Clinical Research Center in Chile, told Healio. “With this data, [physicians] can hopefully choose, with more confidence, this combination instead of others.”

Background and methodology

The CheckMate 9ER trial assessed the efficacy and safety of nivolumab (Opdivo, Bristol Myers Squibb) — a PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor — and cabozantinib (Cabometyx, Exelixis), a multitargeted TKI, vs. sunitinib (Sutent, Pfizer), a TKI that targets VEGFR.

The trial included 651 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Researchers randomly assigned 323 patients to 240 mg IV nivolumab every 2 weeks plus 40 mg oral cabozantinib daily. The other 328 patients received 50 mg oral sunitinib daily in a 4-weeks-on, 2-weeks-off schedule.

Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

PFS served as the primary endpoint. OS, objective response rate and safety served as secondary endpoints.

Results

Previously reported results — based on median follow-up of 32.9 months — showed patients assigned nivolumab-cabozantinib achieved longer PFS (median, 16.6 months vs. 8.3 months; HR = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.46-0.68) and OS (median, 37.7 months vs. 34.3 months; HR = 0.7; 95% CI, 0.55-0.9).

At ASCO GU, Burotto reported results based on median follow-up of 44 months.

Results continued to show benefit with the nivolumab-cabozantinib combination with regard to PFS (median, 16.6 months vs. 8.4 months; HR = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.48-0.71) and OS (median, 49.5 months vs. 35.5 months; HR = 0.7; 95% CI, 0.56-0.87).

Results also showed a higher ORR in the nivolumab-cabozantinib group (55.7% vs. 28.4%).

Researchers observed no new safety signals during the additional follow-up.

Nearly all patients experienced any-grade treatment-related adverse events (97% for the combination vs. 93% with sunitinib). A higher percentage of those assigned the combination experienced grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events (67% vs. 55%).

Next steps

The updated results suggest the nivolumab-cabozantinib combination is a viable treatment option for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma, Burotto said.

“The most important thing is to get all data ... [to] see if we can see a tail in the curve and [whether] we can really cure some patients with this combination,” Burotto told Healio. “I believe we can.”