Read more

December 22, 2022
2 min read
Save

Sacituzumab govitecan extends survival regardless of Trop-2 expression in breast cancer

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

SAN ANTONIO — Sacituzumab govitecan prolonged survival compared with physician’s choice of therapy among patients with heavily pretreated breast cancer, according to results presented at San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.

Perspective from Steven J. Isakoff, MD, PhD

Findings from a post-hoc analysis of the TROPiCS-02 trial — which included patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced disease — showed benefit with sacituzumab govitecan (Trodelvy, Gilead) regardless of Trop-2 expression, leading researchers to conclude that Trop-2 testing is not required for treatment with the agent.

Objective response rates of sacituzumab govitecan

Background and methods

As Healio previously reported, the randomized phase 3 TROPiCS-02 study included 543 patients with ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 who had received two to four prior lines of chemotherapy and at least one line of endocrine therapy for metastatic breast cancer.

Researchers randomly assigned patients 1:1 to sacituzumab govitecan (n = 272), dosed at 10 mg/kg IV on days 1 and 8 every 21 days, or physician’s choice of treatment (n = 271). Physician’s choice options included capecitabine, eribulin, vinorelbine or gemcitabine.

Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

PFS by blinded independent central review served as the primary endpoint. OS, response, duration of response, safety and quality of life served as secondary endpoints.

The primary analysis showed median PFS of 5.5 months with sacituzumab govitecan vs. 4 months with physician’s choice (HR = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53-0.83).

Results of the second planned interim analysis showed median OS of 14.4 months with sacituzumab govitecan vs. 11.2 months with physician’s choice (HR = 0.79; P = .02).

Results

At SABCS, Hope S. Rugo, MD, professor of medicine and director of breast oncology and clinical trials education at UCSF Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center presented data on efficacy outcomes by Trop-2 expression.

This analysis included 238 patients assigned sacituzumab govitecan and 224 assigned physician’s choice.

Most patients (95%) had tumors with Trop-2 H-scores above 0l; in this group, 42% had H-scores less than 100 and 58% had H-scores of 100 or higher.

Median follow-up was 10.2 months for PFS and 12.5 months for OS.

Researchers reported longer median PFS with sacituzumab govitecan among those with H-scores less than 100 (5.3 months vs. 4 months; HR = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.54-1.09), as well as those with H-scores of 100 or higher (6.4 months vs. 4.1 months; HR = 0.6; 95% CI, 0.44-.81).

Researchers also reported longer median OS with sacituzumab govitecan among those with H-scores less than 100 (14.6 months vs. 11.3 months), as well as those with H-scores of 100 or higher (14.4 months vs. 11.2 months; HR = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.62-1.11).

Researchers reported objective response rates with sacituzumab govitecan of 24% among those with H-scores 10 or lower, 18% among those with H-scores of 10 to 99, and 23% among those with H-scores 100 or higher.

The agent exhibited a safety profile consistent with prior reports, according to researchers.