Read more

October 26, 2022
2 min read
Save

Radiation therapy for asymptomatic bone metastases prolongs survival, prevents pain

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Palliative radiation therapy for high-risk asymptomatic bone metastases significantly prolonged OS while reducing skeletal-related events compared with standard therapy, phase 2 trial results showed.

Perspective from Jessica Wong, MD, MEng

Findings from the randomized study — presented at American Society for Radiation Oncology Annual Meeting — suggest that painful complications related to solid tumors can be prevented by treating asymptomatic bone metastases with radiation therapy, the investigators noted.

Outcomes of patients with asymptomatic mestastases

Background

Radiation therapy is the standard of care for symptomatic bone metastases, and much evidence exists on its benefit for treating pain in patients with cancer, according to Erin F. Gillespie, MD, assistant attending radiation oncologist at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

Erin Gillespie
Erin F. Gillespie

“The question has frequently arisen about whether to treat asymptomatic bone metastases — particularly those that arise in critical locations that we know can be associated with further complications,” she said during the presentation.

Her group's experience suggests that bone metastases can become painful and lead to subsequent hospitalizations. Furthermore, Gillespie said these lesions are often present in previous imaging.

“The question we asked is can radiation applied to these lesions — before they become painful — actually prevent complications ... and improve patient quality of life?"

Methodology

Gillespie and colleagues enrolled 78 patients with 122 bone metastases for the phase 2 study to examine prophylactic use of palliative radiation therapy in adults with high-risk asymptomatic bone metastases vs. standard-of-care therapy.

The most common primary disease types included lung cancer (27%), breast cancer (24%) and prostate cancer (22%). Eligible patients had at least five metastatic lesions, including one asymptomatic, high-risk lesion.

Investigators randomly assigned patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive either prophylactic radiation therapy (n = 39) or standard of care with no radiation therapy (n = 39).

Skeletal-related events, including fracture, cord compression or surgical/radiation intervention, served as the study’s primary outcome — analyzed as time from treatment randomization until either death or 1-year follow-up. Researchers sought to determine whether prophylactic treatment of asymptomatic lesions couple prevent these events, which may increase risk for death and health care costs.

Median follow-up was 2.4 years.

Key findings

Results showed significantly fewer skeletal-related events in the radiation therapy group compared with the standard-of-care group (1.6% vs. 29%; P < .001).

Investigators reported no patients hospitalized for skeletal related events in the radiation therapy group compared with 11% of those in the standard-of-care group (P = .045).

Researchers also reported significantly longer median OS in the radiation therapy group compared with the standard-of-care group (1.7 years vs. 1 year; HR = 0.5; 95% CI, 0.28-0.91).

Patients who received radiation reported reduced pain at 3 months compared with the standard-of-care group (P < .05) and better pain-related quality of life at 1 year after therapy, the investigators noted.

Clinical implications

"This first randomized trial of its kind suggests radiation for high-risk bone metastases in patients without pain may be a promising new treatment approach,” Gillespie told the audience. “Future research is needed to confirm the overall survival benefit, as well as optimize which patients to treat and ensure timely referral.”