June 05, 2018
2 min read
Save

Targeted inhibitor induces responses for soft tissue sarcoma

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

CHICAGO — The receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor anlotinib extended PFS and showed greater antitumor activity compared with placebo among patients with soft tissue sarcoma who regressed on or were intolerant to anthracycline-based chemotherapy, according to data presented at the ASCO Annual Meeting

Perspective from Seth M. Pollack, MD

“No standard therapy is available in China for [patients with] soft tissue sarcoma who progressed after first-line chemotherapy,” Yihebali Chi, MD, PhD, of Cancer Institute and Hospital at the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences in Beijing, said during her presentation. “Anlotinib [Advenchen Laboratories, Jiangsu Chia-Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical] is a multitarget receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets VEGFR, FGFR, PDGFR and c-Kit. Previously, anlotinib has shown single-agent activity in a single arm, phase 2 study presented at ASCO in 2016.”

In the phase 3 randomized, double-blind trial of anlotinib, Chi and colleagues assessed 233 Chinese patients with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, synovial sarcoma, alveolar soft part sarcoma, fibrosarcoma, clear cell sarcoma or epithelioid sarcoma.

The researchers randomly assigned patients 2:1 to anlotinib or placebo. Patients receive 12 mg daily anlotinib for 2 weeks on, 1 week off.

PFS served as the study’s primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate, disease control rate and OS.

Patients treated with anlotinib demonstrated a median PFS of 6.27 months (95% CI, 4.3-8.4) compared with 1.47 months (95% CI, 1.43-1.57) for placebo (HR = 0.33; P < .0001).

ORR was 10.13% among those treated with anlotinib compared with 1.33% for placebo (P < .0145). The disease control rate also was higher with anlotinib (55.7% vs. 22.67%; P < .0001).

In a subgroup analysis, patients with synovial sarcoma (n = 57), leiomyosarcoma (n = 41) and alveolar soft part sarcoma (n = 56) all had significant improvements in PFS compared with placebo (P <.0001 for all). However, among patients with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (n =20), liposarcoma (n = 22), fibrosarcoma (20) and clear cell sarcoma or epithelioid sarcoma (n = 17) the improvements seen with anlotinib did not reach statistical significance.

OS data were not yet mature.

The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events in the anlotinib group included hypertension (18.99%), gamma glutamyl transferase elevation (4.43%), increased triglycerides (4.43%), elevated LDL (3.16%), hyponatremia (3.16%) and reduced neutrophil count (3.16%). – by Cassie Homer

Reference:

Chi Y, et al. Abstract 11503. Presented at ASCO Annual Meeting; June 1-5, 2018; Chicago.

Disclosures: The authors report no relevant financial disclosures.