December 09, 2011
1 min read
Save

High recurrence score associated with other high-risk factors

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium

SAN ANTONIO — High-risk status, according to the recurrence score multi-gene assay, is predictive of high risk measured by uPA/PAI-1, high-grade central pathology and luminal B subtype, researchers reported here.

Oleg Gluz, MD, of the West German Study Group in Mönchengladbach, Germany, presented the final correlation analysis from the phase 3 West German Study Group Plan B trial, in which the efficacy of anthracycline-free chemotherapy in HER-2–negative breast cancer was assessed after molecular-based assessment according to Oncotype DX and uPA/PAI-1.

“Adjuvant chemotherapy indication is mainly based on assessment of recurrence risk,” Gluz said. “Overtreatment is frequent in low- and intermediate-risk groups in HR-positive disease. This may be reduced by optimizing prognostic tools, including Ki-67, central grade and uPA/PAI-1.”

From April 2009 to June 2011, 3,037 patients were recruited and 2,290 patients were randomly assigned. Among 2,361 patients, 18% had a recurrence score of 0 to 11; 61% had a recurrence score of 12 to 25; and 21% had a recurrence score of more than 25. Data on central grade were available in 1,509 patients and data on Ki-67 were available in 592 patients.

There was a moderate positive correlation between Ki-67 and recurrence score (P,.001) and between recurrence score and central grade (P,.001). A high recurrence score predicted grade-3 tumors, but 30% to 33% of tumors within the low-risk recurrence score group were also grade 3. High-risk recurrence score is predictive of uPA/PAI-1, poor grade and luminal B subtype, but the converse is not true, Gluz said.

“High recurrence score usually implies high risk by central grade 3, luminal B subtype and high uPA/PAI-1,” he said. “However, risk assessment within low and intermediate recurrence score risk groups exhibits substantial heterogeneity according to central grade, luminal subtype and uPA/PAI-1. Outcome data are needed for definite statement regarding clinical significance of this heterogeneous risk group assessment.”

Disclosure: Dr. Gluz reports no relevant financial disclosures.

Earn CME this spring at the HemOnc Today Breast Cancer Review & Perspective meeting to be held March 23-24, 2012 at the Hilton San Diego Bayfront. See details at HemOncTodayBreastCancer.com.

For more information:

  • Gluz O. #S4-3. Presented at: the 2011 CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; Dec. 6-11, 2011; San Antonio.
Twitter Follow HemOncToday.com on Twitter.