Fact checked byHeather Biele

Read more

October 25, 2023
2 min read
Save

Sensitivity of next-generation Cologuard in precancer detection ‘numerically exceeded’ FIT

Fact checked byHeather Biele
You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Key takeaways:

  • The next-generation Cologuard test was significantly more likely to detect cancer (94% vs. 67%) compared with FIT.
  • The test also was more likely to detect precancerous lesions vs. FIT (43% vs. 23%).
Perspective from Mohamad Mouchli, MD

VANCOUVER, British Columbia — A next-generation, multitarget stool DNA test detected colorectal cancer with 94% sensitivity and 91% specificity, outperforming fecal immunochemical testing, according to late-breaking data here.

“The next-generation Cologuard is different from FIT in that it has different markers,” Thomas F. Imperiale, MD, professor of medicine at Indiana University Medical Center, told Healio at the ACG Annual Scientific Meeting. “They’re all methylated DNA markers, as opposed to the current version where there were two methylated DNA markers and mutations in the KRAS gene.”

Thomas F. Imperiale, MD

To evaluate the clinical performance of the next-generation, multitarget stool DNA test (Cologuard, Exact Sciences), Imperiale and colleagues conducted the BLUE-C study, which enrolled 26,758 participants scheduled for screening colonoscopy at 186 U.S. sites between November 2019 and January 2023.

Participants provided stool samples for testing with next-generation Cologuard and FIT prior to colonoscopy. Researchers categorized colonoscopy findings as CRC, advanced precancerous lesions (APL), no advanced neoplasia, and nonneoplastic or negative colonoscopy.

Of the enrolled population, 75.4% (mean age, 63 years; 53.2% women; 60.1% non-Hispanic white) had evaluable findings.

According to results, there were 98 cases of CRC, 2,144 APLs and 17,934 with no advanced neoplasia. The next-generation Cologuard demonstrated a specificity for absence of advanced neoplasia of 90.6% (95% CI, 90.1-91), while sensitivities for CRC, APL and APL with high-grade dysplasia were 93.9% (95% CI, 87.1-97.7), 43.4% (95% CI, 41.3-45.6) and 74.6% (95% CI, 65.6-82.3).

“The most important result was improved specificity, which is expected to reduce the false positive rate by 30% without losing any sensitivity,” Imperiale said. “With a lot of tests, when you improve specificity, you lose sensitivity and that didn’t happen here. Since the components of this next-generation test are different from the current version, sensitivity was preserved, or slightly improved, for both cancer and advanced precancerous lesions even with the improvement in specificity.”

In addition, next-generation Cologuard was significantly more likely to detect cancer (94% vs. 67%) or precancerous lesions (43% vs. 23%) than FIT, according to a related Exact Sciences press release.

“The most important of those advanced precancerous lesions, which are the ones with high grade dysplasia, were detected about 75% of the time, which is really excellent for a noninvasive test,” Imperiale told Healio. “This 75% sensitivity numerically exceeded that of FIT for CRC, which was 67.3%.”

Further, results showed specificity for nonneoplastic findings or negative colonoscopy was 92.7% (95% CI, 92.2-93.1).

“What patients and providers are going to recognize is fewer false positives and equal performance in detection of CRC and advanced precancerous lesions,” Imperiale said. “With fewer false positives there will be fewer people undergoing follow-up colonoscopy where nothing’s found that explains the positive result, which can generate worry and unnecessary testing.”

He added, “As far subsequent research, I think future studies will evaluate cost-effectiveness, as well as patient and provider acceptance.”

Reference: