Read more

January 29, 2020
4 min read
Save

Dual-hormone artificial pancreas ‘next logical treatment’ for type 1 diabetes

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Ahmad Haidar

Adults with type 1 diabetes may be able to maintain their glucose levels in target range longer, particularly during the day, by using an artificial pancreas with rapid-acting insulin and pramlintide, according to findings published in Diabetes Care.

Perspective from Joseph Aloi, MD

“The novel dual hormone system that we developed has a significant potential, but we still need to confirm the finding in outpatients,” Ahmad Haidar, PhD, assistant professor in the department of biomedical engineering and an association member of the department of medicine and division of experimental medicine at McGill University in Montreal, told Healio. “We still need to have a coformulation of insulin/pramlintide to translate this into clinical practice.”

Haidar and colleagues assessed how frequently a cohort of 28 adults with type 1 diabetes (mean age, 25 years; 43% women) were able to maintain blood glucose levels between 3.9 mmol/L and 10 mmol/L during 24 hours using artificial pancreas systems that delivered either rapid insulin plus pramlintide (Symlin, AstraZeneca), regular insulin plus pramlintide, or rapid insulin alone. Blood glucose was measured at 10- to 30-minute intervals, according to the researchers, who noted that there was a roughly 2-week “optimization period” prior to each study visit depending on the system to be used, with the researchers randomly assigning the order in which participants used each system.

“To initialize the dual-hormone systems properly, we need parameters that result from a prolonged use of insulin and pramlintide concomitantly, and this requires a run-in period,” the researchers wrote. “Without a run-in period, the gastrointestinal outcomes during the dual-hormone artificial pancreas interventions would reflect the acute effect of pramlintide.”

Type 1 diabetes diagnosis 2019 
Adults with type 1 diabetes may be able to maintain their glucose levels in target range longer, particularly during the day, by using an artificial pancreas with rapid-acting insulin and pramlintide.
Source: Adobe Stock

The researchers also noted that the artificial pancreas using rapid insulin plus pramlintide “spread the delivery of pramlintide over 20 [minutes]” and was “mimicking a dual-wave bolus.”

Participants maintained glucose levels between 3.9 mmol/L and 10 mmol/L, or in range, 84% of the time while using the rapid insulin plus pramlintide system and 74% of the time while using rapid insulin alone (P = .0014). The researchers also found that participants using rapid insulin plus pramlintide achieved mean glucose of 7.4 mmol/L and participants using rapid insulin alone achieved mean glucose of 7.9 mmol/L (P = .0053). However, “there were no benefits associated with the regular insulin-and-pramlintide artificial pancreas,” the researchers wrote.

Participants maintained glucose levels in range 78% of the time while using rapid insulin plus pramlintide and 63% of the time while using rapid insulin alone between 8 a.m. and 11 p.m. Participants achieved 7.9 mmol/L in mean glucose when rapid insulin plus pramlintide was used and 8.7 mmol/L in mean glucose when rapid insulin alone was used between 8 a.m. and 11 p.m. (P = .0011).

PAGE BREAK

According to the researchers, hypoglycemia occurred in 12 instances when rapid insulin plus pramlintide was used, in 18 instances when regular insulin plus pramlintide was used and in 11 instances when rapid insulin alone was used. The researchers also noted that gastrointestinal adverse effects, such as nausea or heartburn, occurred six times when rapid insulin plus pramlintide was used and 11 times when regular insulin plus pramlintide was used, and not at all when rapid insulin alone was used.

“We did better than conventional pump therapy … so it’s a great intervention, but we still have a long way to go before everyone gets normal control. This is why this work is important,” Haidar told Healio. “It’s one of the interventions that’s shown the most promise.” – by Phil Neuffer

For more information:

Ahmad Haidar, PhD, can be reached at ahmad.haidar@mcgill.ca.

Disclosures: Haidar reports he has received research support and consultant fees from AgaMatrix, Dexcom, Eli Lilly and Medtronic.