October 21, 2016
1 min read
Save

Allergan 410 implant provides safe, satisfactory results in breast reconstruction

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

The Allergan 410 cohesive gel anatomical implants offered a safe option for breast reconstruction with a high rate of patient and surgeon satisfaction, according to study results published in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

The implant is constructed with a barrier shell and filled with a highly cohesive gel that allows the implant to maintain a stable form. The anatomical shape provides less volume in the upper pole and more in the lower breast.

The study included 212 patients undergoing two-stage breast reconstruction with the implant between 2001 and 2013. Patient mean age was 48.5 years (range, 19-66 years) with a median BMI of 24.1 kg/m2.

Follow-up participation was 100% with data collected at 6 month follow up, 1 year postoperatively, and once yearly thereafter until termination of enrollment in 2013. Follow-up was a mean of 3.3 years (range, 0.5-10.2 years).

Most complications were minor, including rippling in 9.4% of patients and asymmetry in 4.2%. The major complications included infection (2.4%), malposition (1.4%), capsular contracture (0.9%), seroma (0.5%), extrusion (0.5%), and implant rupture (0.5%). Excluding cancer recurrence, 9% of patients required implant-related reoperation, including implant replacement (5.7%), implant removal (1.9%), and implant repositioning (1.4%).

The researchers surveyed the patients to determine their level of satisfaction on a five-point scale, 1 being “completely unsatisfied” and 5 being “completely satisfied.” The patients reported an average satisfaction rating of 4.83 (range, 2-5). The examining physician completed a similar survey to assess clinician satisfaction, with a reported average rating of 4.9 (range, 2-5).

“In addition to the safety profile of this highly cohesive anatomical implant, it also offers a more natural appearing result that has been noted to improve patient satisfaction,” the researchers wrote. – by Talitha Bennett

Disclosure: Unger reports no relevant financial disclosures. Please see the full study for the other researchers’ relevant financial disclosures.