July 16, 2015
1 min read
Save

Low-fluence 1064-nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser effectively treats small café-au-lait macules

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

A low-fluence 1064-nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser treatment displayed greater efficacy than a 532-nm laser in treating patients’ café-au-lait macules, according to recently published study results.

South Korean researchers conducted a preliminary study of six patients with café-au-lait macules (CALMs) who underwent a split-lesion comparison of 532-nm and 1064-nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser treatment. In a subsequent prospective trial to measure safety and efficacy, 32 patients (18 female, mean age, 16.3 years) with 39 CALMs received low-fluence 1064-nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser therapy.

Patients in the initial study treated with the 1064-nm laser had a more favorable response and shorter recovery time compared with the 532-nm laser treatment. A clinical response classified as good or better was achieved in all patients in the 1064-nm treatment group vs. a 67% response in the patients treated with the 532-nm laser.

Complete clearance of lesions occurred in 12 CALMS (30.8%) among patients in the prospective trial. At least 50% clearance occurred in 29 treated lesions (74.4%). Adverse events were reported by 15.4% of the patients.

More than 85.7% of lesions measuring less than 16 cm2 displayed a complete response; no lesions larger than 16 cm2 showed a complete response.

“Our analysis revealed that lesion size was the best predictor of a complete response,” the researchers concluded. “We hypothesize that large CALMs exhibited poorer outcomes because it is difficult to deliver energy evenly over a large area when the laser frequency is high (10 Hz). Therefore, we suggest that low-fluence 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser treatment is an effective treatment option for patients with lesions that are relatively small ( < 16 cm2).” – by Bruce Thiel

Disclosure: The researchers report no relevant financial disclosures.