September 27, 2012
1 min read
Save

Social factors associated with very thick melanomas

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Factors related to patients’ sociodemographic characteristics and to the tumors contributed to the incidence of very thick melanomas, according to study results.

Researchers in France used a survey of cancer registries and questionnaires mailed to practitioners to study 898 melanomas diagnosed in 2008. One hundred forty-nine (16.6%) were very thick melanomas (VTM), with a Breslow thickness of 3 mm or greater (mean, 5.85 mm). Of the remaining melanomas, 149 were randomly selected for comparison (mean thickness, 0.88 mm).

In a general practice setting, VTMs were more often diagnosed than thinner melanomas (62% vs. 47.9%; P=.01). While dermatologists made correct diagnoses at first examination at a higher rate than general practitioners for both types of melanomas (77.1% vs. 47.7% for VTMs and 88.8% vs. 43.2% for thinner melanomas; P<.001), they had a lower diagnostic performance for VTMs than for thinner melanomas (77.1% vs. 88.8%; P=.01).

In multivariate logistic regression analysis, VTMs were more often located on the head and neck or lower limb (60.4% vs. 35.5%; P<.001), more frequently achromic (28.8% vs. 12.3%; P=.001), and had a higher proportion of acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM) and nodular melanoma (NM) (54.4% vs. 9.4%; P<.001) when compared with thinner tumors. Other factors associated with VTM compared with thinner melanomas included patients’ age (age 64 years vs. 55 years; P<.001), male sex (58.4% vs. 47.7%; P=.06), single, separated, divorced or widowed (35.8% vs. 23.5%; P=.03), living alone (31.9% vs. 19.0%; P=.01) and being less educated (73.4% vs. 60.3%). Older age, male sex and living alone were independent risk factors for VTM when factors related only to patients were examined, with solitary living the most significant risk (P=.001).

“The recognition of factors related to advanced-stage disease is the cornerstone of efforts to improve melanoma outcome,” the researchers concluded. “Future prevention programs should particularly focus on atypical/non-ABCD criteria [asymmetry, border irregularity, color variegation and diameter more than 6 mm] tumors, including ALM, NM and achromic melanoma … and target men, elderly people and patients living alone, regardless of their age.”