Read more

August 06, 2021
2 min read
Save

Rhythm control therapy beneficial in patients with HF newly diagnosed with AF

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

In patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation for less than 1 year, those with HF benefited from rhythm control therapy compared with the usual care, according to new data from the EAST-AFNET 4 trial.

As Healio previously reported, in the main results of EAST-AFNET 4, early rhythm control therapy with antiarrhythmic drugs and/or catheter ablation within 1 year of AF diagnosis in patients with CV conditions reduced risk for CV events compared with usual care. A subanalysis of patients from the EAST-AFNET 4 cohort with HF was presented at Heart Rhythm 2021 and simultaneously published in Circulation.

Data were derived from Rillig A, et al. LBCT03-02. Presented at: Heart Rhythm 2021; July 28-31, 2021 (hybrid meeting).

“Whether the results of EAST-AFNET 4 could be transferred to those patients with stable heart failure was not known yet,” Andreas Rillig, MD, cardiologist at University Heart and Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany, said at a press conference.

The cohort included 798 patients (mean age, 71 years; 38% women), most of whom had HF with preserved ejection fraction, who were followed for a median of 5.1 years.

During the study period, the primary outcome of CV death, stroke, hospitalization for worsening HF or hospitalization for ACS occurred less frequently in the rhythm control group than in the usual care group (5.7 per 100 patient-years vs. 7.9 per 100 patient-years; HR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.56-0.97; P = .03), Rillig said, noting that the results did not vary by HF status (P for interaction = .63).

There was no difference between the groups in the primary safety outcome of death, stroke or serious events related to rhythm control therapy (rhythm control, 17.9%; usual care, 21.6%; HR = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.62-1.17; P = .33), according to the researchers.

The secondary outcome similar to that used in CASTLE-AF, death or hospitalization for worsening HF, occurred less often in the early rhythm control group (HR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.56-0.98; P = .04), Rillig and colleagues found.

Left ventricular ejection fraction improved in both groups, “mainly in the patients with reduced or midrange left ventricular ejection fraction,” Rillig said at the press conference.

“Rhythm control therapy conveys clinical benefit when initiated within 1 year of diagnosis of atrial fibrillation in patients with signs and symptoms of heart failure,” Rillig said at the press conference. “The clinical benefit is across the spectrum of heart failure subtypes, which is important. Our study supports a treatment strategy of rhythm control therapy with antiarrhythmic drugs or AF ablation within a year of AF diagnosis in patients with signs or symptoms of heart failure.”

Reference: